Wikipedia

Search results

Sunday 11 March 2018

Methods: Development & Validation


Image Source: http://www.particlesciences.com/news/technical-briefs/2009/analytic-method-development-and-validation.html


INTRODUCTION:

·       Product quality and consistency is ensured through total control strategy. In addition to adherences to GXP, process validation, material control following are also major contributors to this strategy:
o   Product Characterization studies
o   Testing and control of In-process Materials- Process Control
o   Testing and control of Intermediate Products- Process Control                                                     
o   Testing and Control of Drug Substance (includes stability testing)
o   Testing and Control of Drug Product (includes stability testing)
o   Comparability exercise (if any additional characteristic evaluated)
·       Product characterization provides the data for setting the product specification. Applicable analytical technologies are used to access below listed product characteristics:
o   Physicochemical Properties
o   Biological Activity
o   Immunochemical Properties
o   Purity, impurity and contaminants
o   Quantity

SELECTION OF A TEST METHOD:

·       Wherever applicable a pharmacopeial method shall be selected for analysis.
·       If pharmacopeia method is not available, an analytical method shall be selected considering intended use and scope (assay used to test a defined characteristic of the product, process control, product characterization, release based on specification at each stage of product development). This shall reflect in method development report.
·       The selected test method shall then be developed.

DEVELOPMENT OF A TEST METHOD:

·       Method development is a scientific exercise to demonstrate that the selected method is fit for intended purpose and scope.
·       The aim of method development is to develop a scientifically-sound, robust, and transferrable analytic method that should be aligned with the drug development stage.
·       Following are the requirements for test method development:
o   Development procedure shall follow proper documentation and all data relating to these studies must be recorded in laboratory notebook (LNB). Raw data, system generated printouts and calculation sheets shall be attached to LNB.
o   Wherever applicable, all the information with respect to physicochemical properties of the analyte shall be collected before start of activity.
o   A representative sample shall be selected for each test method.
o   Information on sample matrix shall be collected.
o   Parameters required to demonstrate the merit of the method (performance characteristics) such as linearity, selectivity, range, accuracy, precision, detection limits etc., shall be defined.
o   Appropriate instrumentation setup shall be ensured with appropriate qualification, calibration and operational procedure.
o   Study plan with respect to each parameter explored and evaluated shall be charted.
o   Development and optimization of the method shall be documented with analyte traceability. Wherever sample matrix has changed, details shall be documented.
o   Percent recoveries shall be demonstrated.
o   Wherever reference standards, solutions, reagents are used date of preparation/manufacturing and use before date/date of expiry shall be recorded.
o   Critical Reagents shall be defined.
·       Successful method development shall ensure that laboratory resources are optimized, sufficient confidence in results is achieved, method meets the required objectives of development and suitable and reliable for specified purpose. Here, the method can be claimed as “Fit for Use”.
·       All the above requirements of the method development shall finally be captured in method development report along with test data. Method development report shall then finally conclude into proposed test method with assay validity/system suitability criteria.
·       Based on development report proposal the test method shall be defined and documented as “SOP”.
·       SOP is used for sample testing during initial phase of development.
·       SOP is also used for method qualification.

QUALIFICATION OF TEST METHOD:

·       Once method is developed, it is further qualified. Method Qualification is a systematic approach targeted to verify that the method is able to meet the design goal.
·       Note: Based on prior experience and platform technologies handled, Oftentimes, test methods are not developed from the ground up. Such methods can be optimized for particular product and product matrix. In such cases, direct method qualification can be attempted. Reference to suitable method development of similar platform technology/ product class is required.
·       Method shall be qualified using a preapproved Method Qualification Protocol (MQP).
·       Qualification protocol shall provide the rational for selection of performance parameters (such as specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision etc.) selected for demonstration method performance.
·       Qualification protocol shall also define the sample characteristics, sample matrices (and changes if any from development phase), sample preparations, critical reagents, reference standards, equipment’s/instruments, there qualification & calibration requirements & status, data analysis, statistical functions and other calculations employed.
·       Qualification protocol may not have predefined method performance specifications, however based on intended application of test method minimal performance capabilities may be predefined.
·       Qualification studies shall be performed using qualified/ calibrated equipment’s and analyst well versed with analytical technique under exploration.
·       All the data shall be concurrently recorded and authenticated with signatures in qualification records by analyst and supervisor (as and when required).
·       All the raw data shall be attached in original and soft data archived for further reference.
·       All calculations and calculation printouts (if excel sheets are used) shall be verified by supervisor.
·       Wherever, the method fails to achieve the performance characteristic, it shall be re-optimized to meet the performance characteristic required for its intended application.
·       If still it fails to achieve the required performance, the method shall be rejected for intended application.
·       All the activities and findings of method qualification shall be reported in a Method Qualification Report (MQR). It shall include all the elements defined above and shall provide a test method with control strategies.
·       When deemed necessary, the SOP shall be revised to include the recommendations in the method qualification report.
·       The data generated during method qualification studies forms the basis for setting acceptance criteria for method validation which shall be performed during late stages of development lifecycle.

VALIDATION OF TEST METHOD:

·       Data generated during method development, method qualification and subsequent analysis and changes made in qualified method form the basis of method validation.
·       Analytical method validation is the process of demonstrating that an analytical procedure is suitable for its intended purpose.
·       Method shall be validated using a preapproved Method Validation Protocol (MVP).
·       Validation protocol shall have predefined method performance specification which shall be met at each trial run (replicate/repeat).
·       If the validation experiment fails to meet the established specification, it can fail the validation study unless a clear assignable cause (e.g. analyst error) is found and corrected.
·       All validation activities shall be performed using qualified equipment’s/instruments, relevant calibrations shall be ensured, validated calculation sheets shall be used, analyst shall be trained and all relevant software should be validated.
·       Representative samples shall be identified and selected. These samples shall be traceable to a fixed manufacturing process to ensure correct matrices are used.
·       Critical materials/reagents shall be identified and wherever applicable qualified e.g. standards and reagents for purity, accurate amounts and sufficient stability.
·       Validation protocol shall define suitable validation characteristics and performance criteria. This shall be selected based on test method applicability with reference to available regulatory guidance’s.
o   Typical validation characteristics are:
o   Specificity
o   Linearity and Range
o   Precision
§  Method precision (Repeatability)
§  Intermediate precision (Ruggedness)
o   Accuracy
o   Solution stability
o   Limit of Detection (LOD)
o   Limit of Quantification (LOQ)
o   Robustness
·       During validation experiments all the data shall be concurrently recorded and authenticated with signatures in qualification records by analyst and supervisor (as and when required).
·       All the raw data shall be attached in original and soft data archived for further reference.
·       All calculations and calculation printouts (if excel sheets are used) shall be verified by supervisor.
·       All the activities and findings of method qualification shall be reported in a Method Validation Report (MVR) along with deviations and changes made.
·       Method validation report shall provide the recommended test procedure with controls, and acceptance criteria. It shall also define the reasons for revalidation which shall further be captured in standard test procedure.

STANDARD TEST PROCEDURE (A QUALITY CONTROL ASSAY):

·       Test method which passes the validation study becomes a ‘Quality Control Assay’ and is documented as Standard Test Procedure (STP).
·       STP shall define the scope and intended purpose of assay, provide details of test method, reagents/materials/standard required, critical reagents identified, system suitability defined, acceptance criteria defined along with situations which require change in test method and subsequent validation/revalidation requirements.

REVALIDATION:

·       A revalidation is necessary whenever a method is changed, and the new parameter lies outside the operating range defined in STP. This may also be required where the source of the error cannot be traced back to the instruments or any other cause.
·       Other changes that may warrant revalidation (partial of full) study are listed below:
o   new samples with new compounds or new matrices,
o   new analysts with different skills,
o   new instruments with different characteristics,
o   new location with different environmental conditions,
o   new chemicals and/or reference standards and
o   modification of analytical parameters.
·       Any changes in process shall also be evaluated for impact on test method and its validity.
·       Note: All the changes shall follow change control procedure.

METHOD VERIFICATION:

·       Compendial procedures are also subject to regulations that require demonstration of suitability under actual conditions of use.
·       The verification process for compendial test procedures is the assessment of whether the procedure can be used for its intended purpose, under the actual conditions of use for a specified drug substance and/or drug product matrix.
·       Relevant regulatory/pharmacopeial guidance shall be referred for verification of compendial procedures that are being performed for the first time to yield acceptable results utilizing the personnel, equipment, and reagents available.

GLOSSARY & TERMS:

·       Analyte: A substance whose chemical constituents are being identified and measured.
·       Analytical Technologies: ‘Test Methods’ which measures and represent the product characteristic in terms of test results during product processing/ batch manufacturing and shelf life are considered as analytical technologies.
·       Characterization: Characterization refers to the broad and general process by which a material's structure and properties are probed and measured. It is carried out using appropriate, state-of-the-art biochemical, biophysical and biological analytical techniques. For the active ingredient(s) (i.e. the   desired product), details should be provided on primary and higher-order structure, post-translational modifications (including, but not limited to, glycoforms), biological activity, purity, impurities, product-related (active) substances (variants), and immunochemical properties, where relevant.
·       Comparability: Head-to-head comparison of a biotherapeutic product with a licensed originator product with the goal of establishing similarity in quality, safety and efficacy. Products should be compared in the same study using the   same procedures.
·       Drug Product: A pharmaceutical product type that contains a drug substance, generally in association with excipients.
·       Drug Substance: The active pharmaceutical ingredient and associated molecules that may be subsequently formulated, with excipients, to produce the drug product. It may be composed of the desired product, product-related substances, and product- and process-related impurities. It may also contain other components such as buffers.
·       In-process samples: This represents the samples generated during product processing and results demonstrate degree of process control.
·       Intermediate: This represents the product manufactured at different stages of manufacturing process and intermediate of one stage is starting material of the next stage. These intermediate products have a predefined attributes which at times forms the specification. Few intermediates can be stored / held at specified conditions for defined duration before proceeding for next step.
·       Life Cycle-Analytical Technologies: Identification of test method, subsequent development, qualification and validation to finally accept it as quality control method.
·       Life Cycle-Product: Product Life cycle includes following technical activities for new and existing products: (1) Product Development (Preclinical and clinical), (2) Technology Transfer, (3) Commercial Manufacturing, (4) Product Discontinuation.
·       Method Qualification: A protocol based scientific study to determine method performance capabilities as required for an intended purpose. There are no or minimal predefined method performance specification.
·       Method Validation: A protocol based scientific study with predefined performance specification performed to establish, by laboratory studies, that the performance characteristics of the procedure meet the requirements for the intended analytical applications.
·       Quality Control Assay: An assay which is used for testing and release of material post method validation (can be established during Clinical Manufacturing or Commercial Manufacturing based on strategic approach adopted). It is represented as standard test procedure (STP).
·       Reference Biologic: A reference biologic (biotherapeutic) product is used as the comparator for head-to-head comparability studies with the similar biotherapeutic product in order to show similarity in terms of quality, safety and efficacy. Only an originator product that was licensed on the basis of a full registration dossier can serve as an RBP. The term does not refer to measurement standards such as international, pharmacopoeial or national standards or reference standards.
·       Specification: A specification is defined as a list of tests, references to analytical procedures, and appropriate acceptance criteria which are numerical limits, ranges, or other criteria for the tests described. It establishes the set of criteria to which a drug substance, drug product or materials at other stages of its manufacture should conform to be considered acceptable for its intended use.

·       Test Result: The value of a characteristic obtained by carrying out a specified ‘Test Method’.



No comments:

Post a Comment