Wikipedia

Search results

Sunday, 1 July 2018

HISTORY OF YELLOW FEVER: OPENING OF PANAMA CANAL TO ONLY NOBEL PRIZE FOR A VIRUS VACCINE (DR. MAX THEILER)


1916:
          The newly established Rockefeller Foundation Yellow Fever Commission visited suspected endemic countries in Ecuador, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil. From their observations they concluded that the only endemic center in South America was in Guayaquil, Ecuador. The Commission also recommended the investigation to be extended to West Africa.
                    
          The actual campaign for the eradication of Yellow Fever from Guayaquil was held up due to First World War. Preliminary work however did get underway.

1918:
          A special commission arrived in Guayaquil and carried on their intensive investigations for about two months. The commission left Guayaquil early in September 1918 however Dr Hideyo Noguchi stayed on until the end of October.
         
The full-scale campaign for the eradication of Yellow Fever from Guayaquil was started.

1919:
          Dr.Hideyo Noguchi announced the discovery of leptospira that in guinea-pigs produced lesions suggestive of yellow fever (Noguchi, 1919)

          After much experimental work, Noguchi decided (erroneously, as was proved later) that this leptospira was the cause of yellow fever and named it Leptospira icteroides (Noguchi, 1925). He found that the use of a potent immune serum in the treatment of experimental infection of guinea pigs with L. icteroides gave definite protection (Noguchi, 1920).  Experiments also showed that the injection of killed cultures of L. icteroides into susceptible animals conferred on them a state of immunity that endured for at least 5 or 6 months (Noguchi and Pareja, 1921). Both the serum and vaccine were put to trial in humans without delay and some thousands of people received inoculations.

          Thus the findings of Reed commission were contradicted and the etiology of Yellow Fever was again in a state of confusion. The then lack of susceptible animals and proper tools for diagnosis of Yellow Fever and its differentiation from spirochetal jaundice misled Noguchi.

          In June last case of Yellow Fever was reported in Guayaquil after antimosquito measures. This project marked the first effort of the Rockefeller Foundation at Yellow Fever control through antimosquito measures. The lifting of the long standing quarantine against Guayaquil in 1920 attested its success.

          After this success Rockefeller Foundation worked in many endemic areas. By the end of 1924 the disease had been eradicated from Mexico, Central America, and Ecuador. Other trouble areas in South America were being attacked.

1920:
          The West Africa Commission recommended that another, more fully equipped, commission be sent to carry out extensive and prolonged investigation of the situation in West Africa, including a laboratory study of the suspected fevers of the region.

1925:
          The danger that the completion of Trans African Railways may carry the fever to the East revived the fear, which the opening of Panama Canal aroused.

          Following the recommendations of the Yellow Fever Commission to West Coast of Africa, in this year another commission, under the leadership of Dr. Henry Beeuwkes, was sent to West Africa Yellow Fever Commission established headquarters in Lagos in Nigeria.

          During the first 2 years of the operation the Commission failed to isolate Noguchi’s L. icteroides. In the meantime doubt as to validity of Noguchi’s findings had also arisen in a number of other quarters in Brazil, in Cuba and in U.S.A. (Agramonte, 1924; Theiler and Sellards, 1926).

          Laboratory work on the disease was very much handicapped by the lack of an experimental animal.  This was so important an obstacle at this juncture that the group in West Africa concentrated on trying to overcome it. So, a systematic search began.  The investigators tried guinea pigs, white rats, and white mice imported from Europe, a number of species of African monkeys, as well as pouched rats (Cricetomya gambianus), puppies, kittens, goats, all the local fauna, but in vain (Vincent, 1927; Stokes et. al., 1923 a).

          In further effort to find such an animal, Dr. Henry Beeuwkes, the Director of the Commission visited the firm of Carl Hagenbeck in Hamburg and there chose animals from parts of the world distant to West Africa. They were Indian rhesus and crown monkeys and Brazilian marmosets (Stokes et. al., 1928, a).

1927:
          In May during an epidemic of Yellow Fever at Lareth, Gold Coast, West Africa; six Indian Crown monkeys (Macacus sinicus) were inoculated with blood from patients with Yellow Fever. Five of these developed fever and died, while one did not show any reaction, it was felt from further studies that these animals are susceptible to Yellow Fever only to a moderate degree (Stokes et. al., 1928, a).

          On June 30 Dr. A. F. Mahaffy, a member of the West Africa Commission stationed at Accra, obtained blood specimens from two patients (in Kpev 100 miles of Accra) suspected of having mild infections, one of whom was a 28 year old African man named Asibi. Dr. Mahaffy and Bauer of the Commission’s laboratory staff inoculated the blood into rhesus monkey (Macacus rhesus), one marmoset and two guinea pigs. Guinea pig and marmoset failed to show any reaction but the monkey developed fever on the 4th day after inoculation, was found moribund and eventually collapsed on following morning (Stokes et. al., 1928, b).

          This first experimental transmission of the virus of yellow fever to an animal other than man opened up entirely new possibilities of laboratory and field research.

          The transmission of infection from this monkey to others was done serially (by injecting citrated blood/serum or by bite of Aedes aegypti mosquito) and more than 50 of the monkeys were tried without failure. The same workers confirmed definitely that the causative agent of yellow fever was filterable virus.

          Propagation of now famous “Asibi strain” of yellow fever virus also began with this experiment (Stokes et. al., 1928, a).

          In December Mathis, Sellard and Laigret isolated another strain of yellow fever virus at Institute Pasteur at Dakar during the yellow fever epidemic, which broke out in Senegal, 1927 (Durieux, 1959; Lloyd, Theiler & Ricci, 1936). This virus had been transmitted to Macacus rhesus monkey by the bite of Aedes aegypti fed 24 and 31 days earlier on the patient suffering from mild yellow fever, a Syrian man named Francois Mayali (Monath, 2004). The virulent organs from one of the monkeys infected in this way were transported in frozen state to Europe and America, where they were placed at the disposal of various labs under the name of “French strain” (also known as Dakar Virus).

          Isolation of the “Asibi” and “French” strains in 1927 enabled the development of vaccines, and research was initiated immediately in England, the United States, West Africa and Brazil (Monath, 2004).


Asibi, West African yellow fever survivor, who provided a blood sample from which the virus, used in extensive future research, was isolated. (Image Source)
1928: 
          Edward Hindle of the Wellcome Research Laboratories, London described the first attempt to produce an inactivated vaccine (Hindle E.A. 1928). This and subsequent efforts on inactivated yellow fever vaccines were, however, unsuccessful.

On June 24, 1928 Yellow Fever Laboratory was established by International Health Division in Rockefeller Institute New York as Dr. Wilbur A. Sawyer as Director.

1928-1930:
          Different workers reported transmission of Yellow Fever other than A.aegypti.

Dr. J H Bauer:            A.leutocephalus, A.apicoannulatus and Eretmapodites 
                                   chrysogaster (Bauer, 1928).
Cornelious B Philip:   A.vitattus, A.africanus and A.simpsoni  
                                   (Philip 1928).
Davis and Shannon:  Aedes (Ochlerotatus) scapularis (Davis and Shanon).
Dinger et.al:               Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Dinger et.al.1929).
Philip:                         Taeniorrhynchus (Mansonioides) africanus Theobald
                                    (Philip, 1930 a, b, c)

1929-30:
          Cross immunity tests with different strains of viruses settled the issue, that yellow fever of West Africa and America are the same? (Davis, 1929; Sawyer, Kitchens et. al., 1930)
1930:
          Dr. Max Theiler of the Department of Tropical Medicine of the Harvard Medical School, working with French strain of virus, made the important discovery that white mice were susceptible to yellow fever if inoculated intracerebrally and that a fixed virus for mice with a shortened incubation period and heightened virulence, could be produced by repeated passage through these animals (Theiler, 1930).

1931:
          Theiler described the use of mice in testing sera for protective substances against yellow fever virus (Theiler, 1931).

          This mouse protection test of Theiler’s as modified by Sawyer and Lloyd, became one of the principal tools in yellow fever research and epidemiologic investigation (Sawyer and Lloyd, 1931).

          In the 5 years following isolation of yellow fever virus, 32 cases (5 fatal) had occurred among laboratory workers (Berry and Kitchen, 1931). 

Some form of protective immunization was obviously in order.

          Dr. Wilbur A Sawyer and his associates, as well as other investigators, observed that monkeys inoculated with highly virulent strains of yellow fever virus 4 to 6 hours following an injection of immune serum possessed a solid active immunity after passive immunity had disappeared. Sawyer using a less virulent French strain (established in mice by Theiler) devised a vaccine consisting of a 10 percent suspension of infected mouse brain tissue in fresh, sterile, human immune serum. This material when used with supplementary immune serum, gave solid immunity in monkeys without the development of symptoms. After thorough testing in monkeys, 10 persons were vaccinated between May 13 and June 29, 1931 (Sawyer, Kitchen, and Lloyd, 1931, 1932).

          This was the first vaccine against yellow fever and after its introduction no further cases of disease occurred in the International Health Division Laboratories.

1932:
          Sellard and Laigret tested the French mouse brain virus without immune serum in humans (Sellard and Laigret, 1932). Mathis and Coworkers described the field trials of this vaccine (Mathis, Laigret, Durieux, 1934). Vaccine came to be known as “Dakar” vaccine.

          First tissue culture experiments with yellow fever virus were reported by Haagen and Theiler (1932). They tested various fragments of tissue, using French neurotropic strain, but inspite of good tissue growth, the virus disappeared from the majority in a few days. Finally the best results were obtained when chick embryo was used as tissue component. The tissue component consisted of finally minced chick embryo, and the fluid portion was Tyrode’s solution containing normal monkey serum.

          January to April there was a wholly rural epidemic of yellow fever in the Valle do Chanaan Espirito Santo, Brazil, in which A.aegypti could definitely be ruled out as vector.  The epidemic was described in details by Soper, Penna, et al (1933). Workers proposed jungle cycle of yellow fever transmission by mosquito other than A. aegypti between monkey and accidentally from monkey to man. The complexity of the problem was further accentuated by the repeated detection of yellow fever of jungle origin in Brazil by Soper (1936).

          During 1936 to 1950 the laboratories and epidemiologists in Rio de Janeiro; Bogota, Colombia; Entebba, Uganda; and Lagos, Nigeria tackled the problem of Jungle Yellow Fever in America and Africa by solving the riddles like its transmission, vectors involved, maintenance in nature, etc.

          As a by product of the study of jungle yellow fever by the Rockefeller Foundation quite a number of unknown viruses were isolated form man and mosquitoes such as Ilheus from South America and West Nile; Uganda S, Ntaya and Zika from Africa (Yellow Fever Conference, 1954).


1936:
          Lloyd, Theiler, and Ricci successfully established highly virulent Asibi strain (after 53 monkey passage and more than 3 years without intervening passage through an animal host) in a culture medium containing embryonic mouse tissue and 10 percent monkey serum in Tyrode’s solution for 13 subcultures. Then separate batch of this was cultivated in a medium containing minced whole chick embryo for 58 subcultures. Thereafter the medium was modified by removing the brain and spinal cord from the chick embryo before mincing. The virus was maintained for 160 subcultures. The resultant strain was designated as 17D (Theiler & Smith, 1937 a). 

          The viscerotropic and neurotropic virulence of this virus had been markedly reduced between 89th and the 114th subculture in vitro.

1937:
          Elmendorf and Smith (1937) first reported of the successful infection of the developing chick embryo through chorio-allantoic membrane and direct inoculation of the embryo itself with Yellow Fever Virus.

          Theiler and Smith, after prolonged and careful study in laboratory animals began human immunization (starting November, 1936) with a single inoculation of modified 17D strain of virus, without immune serum (Smith, Penna and Paoliello, 1938; Theiler and Smith, 1937, b). However, normal human serum was added to vaccine as stabilizer. Thus named as “17D serum based’’ vaccine by Hargett, Burruss and Donovan (1943).

          The vaccine entered field trial in Brazil in June, 1937 (Smith, Penna and Paoliello, 1938).  The vaccine became famous by name of “17-D Vaccine”.

1938:
          Over 1 million Brazilians had received the 17 D Vaccine (Monath T.P., 1996) and over 100,000 persons in French West Africa have received the French Neurotropic Vaccine (FNV) (Durieux, 1956).
1939:
          Peltier, Durieux et al., reported application of neurotropic mouse brain vaccine to skin by mild scarification, known as “Scratch” or topical method.

1940:
          In December Fox et. al., prepared experimental batches of 17D serum-based vaccine from which serum was eliminated (Fox et al., 1942). Working independently Hargett et al., found that satisfactory vaccine could be prepared using distilled water as diluent and coined this preparation as “17D aqueous base” vaccine  (Hargett et al., 1943).

1941:
          Out break of encephalitis occurred in Brazil, after immunization with certain lots of insufficiently tested aqueous base vaccine prepared from several sub strains of the original 17D virus.  (199 cases from 55,073 immunized persons i.e. 0.36% & 1 fatality).  Thorough investigation indicated that the vaccine virus itself was responsible (Fox et. al., 1942).  The sudden alteration in character of the 17D virus seemed to have occurred during very small number of subcultures away from the parent strain

1942:
          The technique of vaccine production was altered; so that all vaccines to be used for immunization were initiated from primary and secondary seed lots of known character only and thus the difficulties associated with the properties of virus itself are eliminated (Fox, Kossobudzles & Fonsela Da Cunha, 1943).

          The successful utilization of Yellow Fever Vaccine in the 1940 and effective antimosquito measures, and disappearance of disease from urban areas, however, led to a loss of interest among scientists in the disease and thus not much work was done till 1970 i.e. till the development of molecular techniques.

1951:
          Dr. Max Theiler was awarded Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine in 1951 for his unparallel contribution in the research of yellow fever.



After he retired from the Rockefeller Foundation in 1964, Dr Theiler became professor of epidemiology and microbiology at Yale University, where he remained until 1967. He died of lung cancer on 11 August 1972, at the age of 73. Singapore Med J 2017; 58(4): 223-224

Max Theiler receives the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine from the hands of His Majesty the King Gustaf Adolf VI on December 10, 1951. Photo by the Karolinska Institutet. (Image Source)

Yellow fever vaccination certificate

References for History of Yellow Fever Series will be updated soon.

Monday, 25 June 2018

HISTORY OF YELLOW FEVER- OPENING OF PANAMA CANAL



In all of ancient medical literature there is no reference to Yellow Fever, by that or any other name. Since epidemic yellow fever is a dramatic disease, it seems unlikely that it could have escaped the attention of even very early medical writers. It is perhaps reasonable to conclude that the disease did not exist in ancient civilizations (Warren, 1951).

          There are reports of disease with clinical description similar to yellow fever in 1498 in San Domingo and 1585 in West Africa (Scott, 1939). Carter found the earliest record in a Mayan manuscript describing an epidemic with hematemesis (black vomit, or “xekik”) in the Yucatan in 1648, and suggested that the virus and mosquito vector were introduced from Africa during the slave trade (Carter, 1931).

          According to Garrison (1929) the term yellow fever was first employed by Griffin Hughes in his “Natural History of Barbados” (1750). The yellow in yellow fever does not indicate the association of the disease with jaundice but is derived from the yellow quarantine flag used by the ships during the 17th century (Singh and Bhatia, 1993).

          Yellow Fever was responsible for several epidemics among the settlers in tropical areas of the Americas and Africa during the 17th to the 19th centuries. In addition, epidemics were also reported in Europe following importation of the virus in sailing ships. However, the origin of the disease is in doubt but the susceptibility of ‘New World Monkeys’ but not African monkeys to latent infection by yellow fever indicates African origin of disease (Monath, 1994).

          Until the 20th century, yellow fever was widely believed to be an airborne “miasma” arising from filth, sewage, and rotting organic matter. The series of developments thereafter in disease etiology, etiological agent, epidemiology and vaccine are given below:
1848:
          View, that spread of yellow fever required the presence of an intermediate host, appears to have first advanced by Dr. Josiah Clark Nott of Mobile, Alabama. Nott suggested the mosquito as a possible agent for the dissociation of both yellow fever and malaria (Warren, 1951). Dr Louis Daniel Beauperthuy in Venezuela made a similar suggestion in 1854.

1880:
          The first attempt to dig Panama Canal in 1880-88 failed after 52000 cases of yellow fever and malaria were reported among the 85000 workers (Bres, 1986).

1881:
          The first really serious proponent of the mosquito transmission in yellow fever was Dr. Carlos J. Finlay of Havana, Cuba (Warren, 1951; Burke and Monath, 2001; WHO, 1998).

1897:
          Dr. Giuseppe Sanarelli, an Italian bacteriologist working in the islands of Flores off Montevideo announced that he had discovered the cause of yellow fever to be a bacillus present in about 50% of patients examined by him. He named it Bacillus icteroides (Sanarelli, 1897).

1900:
          In May United States Army organized a commission to study the infectious diseases of Cuba but more specifically yellow fever. Dr. Walter Reed was appointed as president.

          Dr. Reed and colleagues from their studies concluded that “Bacillus icteroides” stand in no causative relation to yellow fever, but when present should be considered as a secondary invader in this disease” (Reed, Carrol et. al., 1900).

          Influenced by the work of Sir Ronald Ross and of Italian observers on the propagation of malaria by the mosquito the commission directed their attention on the Finlay’s theory of the propagation of yellow fever by mosquito (Warren, 1951).
          The Reed Commission recorded 3 cases of yellow fever transmission by mosquitoes that had fed previously on patients clinically ill with yellow fever.  Subsequent work of the commission proved conclusively that:

a)              the mosquito was a vector of yellow fever;
b)             there was an interval of about twelve days between the time the mosquito took an infectious blood meal and the time it could convey the infection to another human being;
c)              yellow fever could be produced experimentally by subcutaneous injection of blood taken from the general circulation of a yellow fever patient during the 1st and 2nd days his illness; and
d)             yellow fever was not conveyed by fomites.

          In the consequence of these findings, Reed and his coworkers (Dr.James Carrol, Dr.Jesse, W.Lazear, and Dr.Aristides Agramonte) suggested that the spread of yellow fever could be most effectively controlled by antimosquito measures and the protection of sick from the bites of mosquitoes (Reed, Carrol and Agramonte, 1901).

1901:
          On October 15, Reed and Carrol injected subcutaneously 3cc of diluted filtered serum from an experimentally infected yellow fever patient into three non-immune persons. Two of these developed clinical yellow fever (Reed and Carrol, 1902).

          Thus for the first time a filterable virus was proved to be the cause of specific human disease.

          In February the Chief sanitary officer in Havana, then Major William C. Gorgas instituted measures to wipe out yellow fever which were based entirely on conclusions of the yellow fever commission.          The results were as dramatic as the scientific findings of the commission. By September, 1901 the disease had been completely eradicated, and it has not reappeared. The antimosquito measures in Havana, in addition to eliminating yellow fever, greatly reduced the incidence of malaria. Gorgas in Panama applied similar approach. Eradication of yellow fever from Panama led to the resumption of work of Panama Canal in 1904 and its completion in 1914 (Warren, 1951).
       
           The Havana and Panama campaigns now constitute an epic chapter in the history of sanitation and preventive medicine.

1913:
          The Rockefeller Foundation was organized for “the well-being of mankind throughout the world”.

          The International Health Commission of the Foundation was created the same year, with Mr. Wickliffe Rose as its director.

          The foundation began its work when the real danger of spreading the disease to countries with high density of population, such as India and Far Eastern countries became obvious as a consequence to the opening of the Panama Canal. Dr. S. P. James of the Indian Medical Service made a thorough investigation of the situation on behalf of the Indian Government and reported that the menace was sufficiently great to call for a permanent quarantine force in Panama, Hong Kong or Singapore, to be maintained at the expense of the English colonies in the East.
         
          Fortunate we are that the disease has not reached India so far, although Aedes ageypti is found in abundance in this country.







Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research















Panama Canal Route Map